Council Special Report

PrintPrint EmailEmail ShareShare CiteCite
Style:MLAAPAChicagoClose

loading...

Reform of the International Monetary Fund

Author: Peter B. Kenen, Adjunct Senior Fellow for International Economics

Reform of the International Monetary Fund - reform-of-the-international-monetary-fund
Order Print Copy

Publisher Council on Foreign Relations

Release Date May 2007

48 pages
ISBN 978-0-87609-404-4
Council Special Report No. 29

Share

Overview

The International Monetary Fundís purpose and scope of work have changed dramatically since its founding after World War II.

Whereas at first the Fund aimed to maintain monetary and exchange-rate stability among a mostly industrialized membership, today most members are developing countries, ranging from large, emerging markets to small, impoverished states. The Fundís surveillance of macroeconomic issues has expanded to cover topics with little direct relevance to its mandate. Moreover, though no industrialized country has drawn on the Fund for more than twenty years, such countries still dominate the Fundís decision-making.

These developments have sparked calls for reform. Proposals to modify the Fundís activities, lending facilities, and governance have come from many experts, including the Fundís managing director. Others, who find the Fund illegitimate or obsolete, have called for its abolition. This Council Special Report, written by Peter B. Kenen under the auspices of the Councilís Maurice R. Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies, rejects the urgings of the abolitionists and goes on to contend that efforts to reform the Fund deserve U.S. support. Many countries remain at risk for financial crises, and a strong Fund that can take the lead in responding is in the U.S. interest. With well-managed reform, the Fund could also play a useful role in resolving global economic imbalances. Overall, the report argues, the United States should not try to achieve unilaterally what the Fund can and should achieve multilaterally.

In making this case, Dr. Kenen offers a balanced assessment of the managing directorís reform proposals in both the Fundís substantive areas of work and its governanceóendorsing some, criticizing others, and urging a more aggressive role in confronting global imbalances. Reform of the International Monetary Fund demonstrates that with reasonable reform of its activities and structures, the Fund can remain relevant to the pressing global economic challenges we face.

More About This Publication

To submit a letter in response to a Council Special Report for publication on our website, CFR.org, you may send an email to CSReditor@cfr.org. Alternatively, letters may be mailed to us at:

Publications Dept.
Council on Foreign Relations
58 East 68th Street
New York, NY 10065

Letters should include the writerís name, postal address, and daytime phone number. Letters may be edited for length and clarity, and may be published online. Please do not send attachments. All letters become the property of the Council on Foreign Relations and will not be returned. We regret that, owing to the volume of correspondence, we cannot respond to every letter.

More on This Topic